... that we weren't waiting for this particular cyclone.
It has been some start to 2011 in Australia. After 2010 set all kinds of records for extreme weather events around the world. The Russian heatwave, Pakistan floods - anyone seeing some kind of pattern here?
One of the world's biggest insurance companies
Munich Re have! And they have:
built up a comprehensive natural catastrophe database, which shows a marked increase in the number of weather-related events. For instance, globally, loss-related floods have more than tripled since 1980, and windstorm natural catastrophes more than doubled, with particularly heavy losses from Atlantic hurricanes. This rise cannot be explained without global warming. Worldwide, 2010 has been the warmest year since records began over 130 years ago.
Given this is an industry that is already directly impacted by climate change and have been really outspoken about it for years, I would expect they would be taken more seriously or to receive more attention. But if someone publicly suggests that
just maybe this greater frequency of extreme weather events is likely to be connected to climate change they are howled down for trying to politicise an event or generally ignored.
The standard answer seems to be "look back at history, we've always had floods/ droughts/ cyclones - this is just natural". As though weather events resulting from climate change have to be something new that we've never experienced before? People... climate change just exacerbates existing weather patterns, exacerbates the extremes... it doesn't create something entirely new!